employee
employee
VAK Russia 5.2.3
VAK Russia 5.2.4
VAK Russia 5.2.5
VAK Russia 5.2.6
VAK Russia 5.2.7
UDC 331.103
UDC 316.723
UDC 37.043
UDC 65.014.1
The purpose of the study is to analyze the relationship between students' perceived organizational culture of the university, their satisfaction with the learning environment and belonging to certain student subcultures in order to develop recommendations for targeted support of professional development. The empirical basis was a survey of 73 students of the 2nd-3rd courses of the PSUAS (technical and managerial profiles) using the adapted OCAI methodology, a modified satisfaction scale and cluster analysis methods. The results revealed the hybrid nature of organizational culture with the dominance of hierarchical and market features with a weak expression of clan and adhocratic components. Clustering allowed us to identify three groups of students, conditionally corresponding to the types of "professionals", "academics" and "adaptive-neutral". A positive correlation has been established between the orientation of "professionals" towards the university's market values and the negative relationship of "academics" with the hierarchical bureaucratization of the environment. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the empirical verification of the relationship between macroparameters of organizational culture and microgroup subcultural attitudes of students. The practical significance of the results is to justify the transition to a differentiated educational policy aimed at strengthening the market component for "professionals" and developing adhocratic and clan elements to support the research potential of "academics".
university organizational culture, student subcultures, M. Trow typology, OCAI, satisfaction with the educational environment, professional development of students, cluster analysis, adaptive education management
1. Sorokin P., Povalko A., Vyatskaya Y. Informal Entrepreneurship Education: Overview of the Russian Field. Foresight and STI Governance. 2021. № 15(4), rr. 22-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.4.22.31.
2. Gitel'man L.D., Isaev A.P., Kozhevnikov M.V., Gavrilova T.B. Fundamental'nye znaniya i gibkost' myshleniya – prioritety upravlencheskogo obrazovaniya dlya tehnologicheskogo proryva. Strategicheskie resheniya i risk-menedzhment. 2022. № 13 (2). S. 92-107. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X-2022-2-92-107.
3. Balackiy E.V., Ekimova N.A., Yurevich M.A. Novye instrumenty povysheniya praktiko-orientirovannosti rossiyskih universitetov: rynok chek-listov. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2021. T. 20, № 4. S. 620-640. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.4.024.
4. Kanke A.A., Eremina T.N. Obrazovatel'naya ekosistema dlya biznes-soobschestva. Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya. E-Management. 2022. № 5(4). S. 31-38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2022-5-4-31-38.
5. Razzak M.R., Al-Riyami S., Palalic R. Organizational Meta Capabilities in the Digital Transformation Era. Foresight and STI Governance. 2022. № 16 (4), rr. 24-31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.24.31.
6. Lektorova Yu. Yu., Prudnikov A. Yu., Medvedeva P.V. Digital skills vs soft skills: novye kompetencii professional'nogo razvitiya na gosudarstvennoy sluzhbe. Ars Administrandi (Iskusstvo upravleniya). 2021. T. 13, № 1. S. 89-109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2021-1-89-109.
7. Sandler D.G. Proyavleniya konkurencii i kvazikonkurencii universitetov Rossii v bor'be za privlechenie abiturientov. Journal of Applied Economic Research. 2022. T. 21, № 1. S. 130-151. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.1.006.
8. Borisova S.G. O formirovanii predprinimatel'skoy korporativnoy kul'tury v rossiyskih vuzah. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya. 2020. T. 20, № 1. S. 86-98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-1-86-98.
9. Petrov Yu.L., Petrova G.I. Cennost' doveriya kak «skrepy» korporativnoy kul'tury sovremennogo universiteta. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2021. T. 25, № 1. S. 107-116. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.01.008.
10. Gus'kova N.D., Erastova A.V. Subkul'tura i ee rol' v formirovanii obschey organizacionnoy kul'tury vuza. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Obschestvennye nauki. 2020. № 4 (56). S. 64-73. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21685/2072-3016-2020-4-7.
11. Trow M. 1960. The Campus Viewed as a Culture. Sprague, H.T. (Ed.) Research on College Students. Boulder, Colorado: WICHE, pp. 106-123.
12. Mal'ceva A.A. Nauchno-tehnicheskie kluby studentov i shkol'nikov v vuzah. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz. 2017. Tom 21, №3. S 121-127. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.03.044.
13. Pankova E.I. Organizacionno-metodicheskie osobennosti deyatel'nosti studencheskih nauchnyh obschestv, orientirovannyh na lichnostnoe samorazvitie molodezhi. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. Tambov. 2018, T. 23, № 175. S. 122-129. DOI: 10.20310.1810-0201-2018-23-175-122-129.
14. Dzhioeva L.G. Rol' igrovyh tehnologiy obucheniya v professional'nom stanovlenii studentov - buduschih yuristov. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal. 2021. T. 10. № 1 (34). S. 421-424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26140/bgz3-2021-1001-0099.
15. Izmaylova E.G., Abduzoyirova M.N., Nechaeva O.A. Sravnenie urovnya effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya tehnologiy razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya i igrovyh tehnologiy pri obuchenii inostrannyh studentov. Dnevnik nauki. 2021. № 5 (53). DOIhttps://doi.org/10.51691/2541-8327_2021_5_7.
16. Kiseleva I.N. Organizaciya vneauditornoy deyatel'nosti studentov kak profilaktika social'no-negativnyh yavleniy v molodezhnoy srede. Uchenye zapiski ZabGU. Ser. Pedagogicheskie nauki. 2018. T. 13, № 5. S. 77-81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21209/2542-0089-2018-13-5-77-81.
17. Suglobova S. A. Razvitie cifrovyh platform v Rossii // Russian Journal of Management. 2023. №. 3. S. 439-450.
