1. Baryannis G., Validi S., Dani S., Antoniou G. Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions // International Journal of Production Research. 2019. Vol. 57. No. 7. P. 2179–2202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530476. URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/416896/supply-chain-risk-management-and-artificial-intelligence-state-of-the-art-and-future-research-directions (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

2. Toorajipour R., Sohrabpour V., Nazarpour A., Oghazi P., Fischl M. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic literature review // Journal of Business Research. 2021. Vol. 122. P. 502–517. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.009. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632030583X (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

3. Yang M., Lim M. K., Qu Y., Ni D., Xiao Z. Supply chain risk management with machine learning technology: A literature review and future research directions // Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2023. Vol. 175. Art. 108859. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108859. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9715461/ (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

4. Jia F., Hu S., He Q., Chen L., Xing X. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain Risk Management: A Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2026. Vol. 73. P. 3264–3277. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2026.3683693. URL: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3199215/ (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

5. Culot G., Podrecca M., Nassimbeni G. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: A systematic literature review of empirical studies and research directions // Computers in Industry. 2024. Vol. 162. Art. 104132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2024.104132. URL: https://www.research.unipd.it/handle/11577/3547194 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

6. Brintrup A., Pak J., Ratiney D., Pearce T., Wichmann P., Woodall P., McFarlane D. Supply chain data analytics for predicting supplier disruptions: a case study in complex asset manufacturing // International Journal of Production Research. 2020. Vol. 58. No. 11. P. 3330–3341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1685705. URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/items/eb5de32e-7f80-4145-9dfc-9dcb5b0d583c (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

7. Baryannis G., Dani S., Antoniou G. Predicting supply chain risks using machine learning: The trade-off between performance and interpretability // Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019. Vol. 101. P. 993–1004. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.07.059. URL: https://keele-repository.worktribe.com/output/416890/predicting-supply-chain-risks-using-machine-learning-the-trade-off-between-performance-and-interpretability (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

8. Tsang Y. P., Choy K. L., Wu C. H., Ho G. T. S., Lam C. H. Y., Koo P. S. An Internet of Things (IoT)-based risk monitoring system for managing cold supply chain risks // Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2018. Vol. 118. No. 7. P. 1432–1462. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2017-0384. URL: https://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/10397/104473?mode=simple (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

9. Qazi A., Dickson A., Quigley J., Gaudenzi B. Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks // International Journal of Production Economics. 2018. Vol. 196. P. 24–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.11.008. URL: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/62225/ (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

10. Hosseini S., Ivanov D. Bayesian networks for supply chain risk, resilience and ripple effect analysis: A literature review // Expert Systems with Applications. 2020. Vol. 161. Art. 113649. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113649. URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7305519/ (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

11. Cavalcante I. M., Frazzon E. M., Forcellini F. A., Ivanov D. A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing // International Journal of Information Management. 2019. Vol. 49. P. 86–97. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.004. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332057326_A_supervised_machine_learning_approach_to_data-driven_simulation_of_resilient_supplier_selection_in_digital_manufacturing (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

12. Modgil S., Singh R. K., Hannibal C. Artificial intelligence for supply chain resilience: learning from Covid-19 // The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2022. Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 1246–1268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-02-2021-0094. URL: https://rgu-repository.worktribe.com/output/2120330/artificial-intelligence-for-supply-chain-resilience-learning-from-covid-19 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

13. Aljohani A. Predictive Analytics and Machine Learning for Real-Time Supply Chain Risk Mitigation and Agility // Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15. No. 20. Art. 15088. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015088. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/20/15088 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

14. Cimino A., Longo F., Mirabelli G., Solina V. A cyclic and holistic methodology to exploit the Supply Chain Digital Twin concept towards a more resilient and sustainable future // Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain. 2024. Vol. 11. Art. 100154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2024.100154. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772390924000167 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

15. Ogunsoto O. V., Olivares-Aguila J., ElMaraghy W. A conceptual digital twin framework for supply chain recovery and resilience // Supply Chain Analytics. 2025. Vol. 9. Art. 100091. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2024.100091. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949863524000347 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

16. Hezam I. M., Ali A. M., Sallam K. et al. Digital twin and fuzzy framework for supply chain sustainability risk assessment and management in supplier selection // Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14. Art. 17718. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67226-z. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-67226-z (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

17. Yang S., Ogawa Y., Ikeuchi K., Shibasaki R., Okuma Y. Post-hazard supply chain disruption: Predicting firm-level sales using graph neural network // International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2024. Vol. 110. Art. 104664. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104664. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420924004266 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

18. Xi D., Nie V., Li W. Application of the LightGBM algorithm in cross-border supply chain risk management: prediction and mitigation strategy development // Scientific Reports. 2026. Vol. 16. Art. 16194. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-47327-7. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-47327-7 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

19. Liu Z., Chen Y. Construction and Empirical Evidence of Supply Chain Disruption Risk Early Warning Model Based on Machine Learning Algorithms // Procedia Computer Science. 2026. Vol. 279. P. 1260–1269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.345. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050926009683 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

20. Zhao T., Chen G., Busababodhin P. An intelligent expert system for logistics disruption prediction and mitigation in global supply chains: Integrating graph-based risk inference with ensemble forecasting // Scientific Reports. 2026. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-61617-0. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-61617-0 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

21. Khan M. R. I. AI-powered predictive analytics for enhancing supply chain resilience and delivery outcomes // Discover Analytics. 2026. Vol. 4. Art. 13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s44257-026-00065-6. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44257-026-00065-6 (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

22. Mirgorodskaya M. G., Polyanskiy O. V., Kapustina N. V. Antikrizisnyy menedzhment i upravlenie riskami preryvaniya cepey postavok // Vestnik Evraziyskoy nauki. 2025. T. 17. № S6. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/antikrizisnyy-menedzhment-i-upravlenie-riskami-preryvaniya-tsepey-postavok (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

23. OECD. OECD Supply Chain Resilience Review: Navigating Risks. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2025. 184 p. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1787/94e3a8ea-en. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2025/06/oecd-supply-chain-resilience-review_9930d256/94e3a8ea-en.pdf (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

24. World Economic Forum. The Global Risks Report 2026. 21st ed. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2026. 102 p. URL: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2026/ (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).

25. Arvis J.-F., Ojala L., Shepherd B., Ulybina D., Wiederer C. Connecting to Compete 2023: Trade Logistics in an Uncertain Global Economy. The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2023. URL: https://lpi.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/LPI_2023_report_with_layout.pdf (data obrascheniya: 13.09.2026).