UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.79 Уголовно-процессуальное право (уголовный процесс)
OKSO 40.03.01 Юриспруденция
OKSO 40.04.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 7582 Уголовно-процессуальное право
BISAC LAW027000 Criminal Procedure
The article examines the institution of compulsory measures of criminal law against legal entities introduced in the Kyrgyz Republic. Some arguments of supporters and opponents of the introduction of this institution in Russia are presented. The procedure for bringing legal entities to administrative responsibility is subjected to comparative legal analysis.
legal entity, compulsory measures of criminal law, criminal responsibility, administrative responsibility, criminal procedure
1. Kachalov V.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic: kriticheskiy analiz argumentov protiv // Lex Russica. 2016. № 12. S. 32-40.
2. Kulbaev A.K. Ugolovnyy process. Bishkek, 2020. 635 s.
3. Sizova V.N. Prognoznye tendencii razvitiya rossiyskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva: monografiya / Nauchnyy redaktor B.Ya. Gavrilov. M.: Yurlitinform, 2020. 228 s.
4. Sulaymanova Ch.N. Voprosy garmonizacii chastnopravovyh i publichno-pravovyh nachal otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic // Vestnik KRSU. 2017. T. 17. № 11. S. 126.
5. Fedorov A.V. Mezhdunarodnye dogovory ob ustanovlenii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic mezhdunarodnye dogovory ob ustanovlenii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic // Uchenye zapiski SPb filiala RTA. 2015. № 2(54). S. 112-124.
6. Fedorov A.V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic za korrupcionnye prestupleniya. IX Ezhegodnye nauchnye chteniya pamyati professora S.N. Bratusya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 1. S. 55.