UDK 34 Право. Юридические науки
GRNTI 10.15 Конституционное (государственное) право
OKSO 40.03.01 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 7531 Конституционное право
BISAC LAW018000 Constitutional
The relevance of the problem under study is due to the issues that arise in the process of attempts to build a welfare state; the current situation in the Russian Federation at the present stage of the development of statehood and social phenomena, as well as the difficulties that arise in the regulatory regulation of these groups of public relations. In this regard, this article is aimed at a comprehensive analysis of the issues of the formation of the social state that arise when trying to resolve them by the national legislator. The leading approach to the study of this problem is a comparative legal analysis of the European and domestic experience of building a social security system and the impact of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on it. The article summarizes the problematic issues related to the search for the optimal domestic model of social security, as well as the doctrinal approach to the topic under consideration.
social state, social justice, social policy, judicial practice, socio-economic rights of a person and citizen, the right to well-being, legal and lexical interpretation
1. Aristov E.V. Social'noe gosudarstvo v konstitucionnom prave: k voprosu o diskussii otnositel'no ponyatiya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2015. № 3(29). S. 8-14.
2. Aristov E.V. Sudebnaya praktika i ee rol' v postanovleniyah Evropeyskogo i Mezhamerikanskogo sudov po pravam cheloveka po interpretacii principa social'nogo gosudarstva // Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. 2016. № 4. S. 72-75.
3. Ahmedov R.M. Praktika deyatel'nosti evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka po rassmotreniyu nekotoryh kategoriy trudovyh del // Aktual'nye problemy gosudarstva i obschestva v oblasti obespecheniya prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina. 2018. № 1. S. 130-140
4. Belov V.G., Smol'kov V.G. Issledovanie sistem upravleniya. M., Luch, 2002. C. 52.
5. Gelbreyt D.K. Novoe industrial'noe obschestvo. M.: Tranzitkniga. 2004. S. 20-31.
6. Grudinin N.S. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie po organizacii samostoyatel'noy raboty studentov. M., 2018. S. 56.
7. Edidin B.A. O dopustimosti sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Yurist. 2004. № 11. S. 57.
8. Elinskiy V.I. Pravovye pozicii konstitucionnogo suda rossiyskoy federacii po otdel'nym voprosam operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2009. № 6(14). S. 8-13.
9. Konvenciya o zaschite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod ETS № 005 (Rim, 4 noyabrya 1950 g.) (s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 2001. № 2. St. 163.
10. Lindbek A. Shvedskiy eksperiment. Ocherki o mirovoy ekonomike. M., 2002. S. 69-145.
11. Mamut L.S. Social'noe gosudarstvo s tochki zreniya prava // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. № 7. S. 31.
12. Mezhdunarodnyy pakt ob ekonomicheskih, social'nyh i kul'turnyh pravah (Prinyat 16.12.1966 Rezolyuciey 2200 (XXI) na 1496-om plenarnom zasedanii General'noy Assamblei OON) // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. 1994. № 12.
13. Nevinskiy V.V. Konstitucionnyy princip social'nogo gosudarstva v resheniyah Konstitucionnogo Suda RF i Federal'nogo Konstitucionnogo Suda FRG // Social'nye prava i praktika Konstitucionnogo Suda RF: Sb. mat. nauch. konf. 5-7 iyunya 2015. SPb. S. 370.
14. Okonchatel'noe Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 8 marta 2012 g. po delu «Valkov i drugie protiv Bolgarii» (po Zayavleniyam № 2033/04, 19125/04, 19475/04, 19490/04, 19495/04, 19497/04, 24729/04, 171/05 i 2041/05) // Byulleten' Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2012. № 3.
15. Pastuhov V.B. Konstitucionnyy format social'noy politiki: ogranicheniya stimuly // Sravnitel'noe konstitucionnoe obozrenie. 2008. № 1. S. 62-66.
16. Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 17 yanvarya 2012 g. po delu «Stanev protiv Bolgarii» // Byulleten' Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2012. № 7.
17. Postanovlenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 27 marta 1998 g. po delu «Petrovich protiv Avstrii» // Byulleten' Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2011. № 4.
18. Reshenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 23 aprelya 2002 g. po voprosu priemlemosti zhaloby № 56869/00, podannoy Aleksandroy Larioshinoy protiv Rossii // Byulleten' Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka. 2002. № 4.
19. Reshenie Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka ot 28 oktyabrya 1999 g. po voprosu priemlemosti zhaloby № 40772/98, podannoy Annoy Panchenko protiv Latvii // URL: http://www.echr.ru/documents/doc/ 2467356/2467356-004.htm.
20. Saudahanov M.V. Genezis ponyatiya «social'noe gosudarstvo»: istoriko-pravovoy analiz // V sbornike: Aktual'nye voprosy prava, ekonomiki i upravleniya. Sbornik statey XVIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii. 2019. S. 113-115.
21. Starshun B.A., Mishin A.A. Social'noe gosudarstvo. M.: Norma, 2001. T. 1-2. S. 56-98.
22. Torlopov V.A. Social'noe gosudarstvo v Rossii: idealy, realii, perspektivy: monografiya. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo RPTU im. A.I. Gercena, 1999. S. 26
23. Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 30.12.2001 № 197-FZ (v red. ot 05.02.2018) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2001. 31 dekabrya.
24. Chirkin V.E. Konstitucionnoe pravo Rossii. M.: Norma, 2016. C. 42-49.
25. Case «M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece» (Application N 30696/09). Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 January 2011. URL: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-103050.
