The article investigates the innovation activities of Russian organizations and influence of such activities on the product export. Possibility of companies to export their products to the local, national and international markets is seen as the competitiveness of Russian economy at the macro, meso- and micro levels. In order to establish the link between product export and competitiveness the probit model is used.
innovation, innovative activity, the export activity, competitiveness, modeling
В общем виде под конкурентоспособностью понимают способность различных субъектов превосходить конкурентов в заданных условиях. Наличие свойства конкурентоспособности ориентирует субъекты конкурентной борьбы на активные действия по достижению определенных рыночных позиций, их удержанию, укреплению и дальнейшему расширению.
Оценка национальной конкурентоспособности представляет интерес для инвесторов, потребителей, производителей, а главное ― для государства, так как отражает способность создавать и увеличивать национальный продукт, наращивать государственные ресурсы, которые позволят обеспечивать устойчивые темпы роста ВВП и качество жизни населения.
Конкурентоспособность российских товаров во многом определяется их востребованностью на внешних и внутреннем рынках. При этом если российские товары и услуги востребованы только на внутреннем рынке, то можно говорить о внутренней конкурентоспособности товаров, если же товары экспортируются на зарубежные рынки, т.е. представляют интерес для иностранных производителей, можно говорить о внешней конкурентоспособности.
1. Arkhipova M.Yu., Aleksandrova E.A. The research of nature of the relationship of innovation and export activity of Russian companies. Prikladnaya ekonometrika [Applied Econometrics], 2014, no 38 (4), p. 88-101.
2. Arkhipova M.Yu., Gutman S.Yu. Main tendencies in patent activity in Russia and the developed world. Sistemy i sredstva informatiki [Systems and means of computer science], 2009, no 19, p. 252-266.
3. Arkhipova M.Yu., Karpov E.S. Investigation of inventive activity in Russia and countries of the world on the basis of patent information resources. Voprosy statistiki [Problems of statistics], 2014, no 7, p. 56-63.
4. Ayvazyan S.A., Mkhitaryan V.S. Prikladnaya statistika. Osnovy ekonometriki [Applied Statistics. Fundamentals of econometrics]. In 2 volumes, 2nd ed., revised. Moscow, YUNITI-DANA Publ., 2001.
5. Belov E.A. Upravlenie konkurentnymi preimushchestvami resursnogo potentsiala uchastnikov rynka myasoproduktov [Management of the competitive advantages of resource potential of meat market participants]: Ph.D. Diss. Moscow, 2011.
6. Verbik M. Putevoditel´ po sovremennoy ekonometrike [Guide to Modern Econometrics]. Moscow, Nauchnaya kniga Publ., 2008.
7. Golikova V.V., Gonchar K.R., Kuznetsov B.V. Empiricheskie dokazatel´stva obuchayushchikh effektov eksporta WP1/2011/2 [Empirical evidence of the training effects of export WP1/2011/2]. Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2011.
8. Gracheva G.A., Kuznetsova T.E., Rud´ V.A. et al. Innovatsionnoe povedenie rossiyskikh predpriyatiy [Innovative behavior of Russian companies] / Edited by L.M. Gokhberga. Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2012.
9. Didenko N.I., Skripnyuk D.F. Modelirovanie ustoychivogo sotsial´no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regionov Arkticheskogo prostranstva RF s ispol´zovaniem sistemy ekonomicheskikh uravneniy [Modeling of sustainable socio-economic development of the regions of the Arctic area of the Russian Federation with the use of economic equations]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Politechnical University, 2014.
10. Magnus Ya.R, Katyshev P.K, Peresetskiy A.A. Ekonometrika. Nachal´nyy kurs [Econometrics. Initial course]. 6th ed., revised and expanded. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2004.
11. Materialy konferentsii «Povyshenie konkurentosposobnosti malykh i srednikh predpriyatiy v usloviyakh VTO: vozmozhnosti, instrumenty, mekhanizmy, infrastruktura» [Materials of the conference “Enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises in the World Trade Organisation: opportunities, tools, machinery, infrastructure”] / Chamber of Commerce of Russian Federation. Moscow, 2012.
12. Seeleva O.N. Analiz makroekonomicheskikh pokazateley sub´´ektov Arkticheskoy zony RF [Analysis of macroeconomic indicators of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation subjects]. St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg Politechnical University, 2014.
13. Simonova M.D. The methodology of multivariate statistical analysis of indicators of globalization of international trade. Voprosy statistiki [Problems of statistics], 2011, no 1, p. 53-57.
14. Yasin E.G. Konkurentosposobnost´ i modernizatsiya ekonomiki [Competitiveness and modernization of the economy]: in 2 volumes / Edited by E.G. Yasin. Vol. 1. Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2004.
15. Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat). URL: http: //www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/science_and_innovations/science.
16. Ancona D.G., Caldwell, D.F. Management issues facing new-product teams in high technology companies. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 1987, no 4.
17. Cooke P. Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage. London, Routledge Publ., 2001.
18. Durand M., Giorno C. Indicators of international competitiveness: Conceptual aspects and evaluation. OECD Economic Studies, Sonbahar, 1987, no 9.
19. EBRD-World Bank Management, Organization and Innovation (MOI) survey (2012). URL: http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Data/ExploreEconomies/2012/russia.
20. Gallup (The American Institute of Public Opinion). URL: http://www.gallup.com/home.aspx.
21. Higgins E.T. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. Socialpsychology: Handbook of basic principles. NewYork: GuilfordPress, 1995, pp. 133-168.
22. Mandeng O.J. International competitiveness and specialization. CEPAL Review, 1991, no 45, p. 25-40.
23. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, 2010.
24. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Russian Federation, 2011.
25. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, 2012.
26. Porter M. E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990.
27. Sirotin V., Arkhipova M. Regional Structure of the Country on Costs and Results of Innovative Activity: The Case of the Russian Federation. Proceeding of the 9th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Edited by B. Galbraith. University of Ulster Business School and School of Social Enterprises Ireland Belfast, UK, 2014, p. 410-419.
