Russian Federation
Ufa, Russian Federation
Birsk, Ufa, Russian Federation
Ufa, Russian Federation
VAK Russia 5.2.1
VAK Russia 5.2.4
VAK Russia 5.2.5
VAK Russia 5.2.6
VAK Russia 5.2.7
UDC 17.03
UDC 330.8
Artificial intelligence (AI), by transforming diagnostics, therapy, and surgery, generates not only new opportunities but also fundamental bioethical and legal dilemmas that require a reconsideration of established models of responsibility. This article focuses on a comparative analysis of Western and Russian bioethical paradigms in their responses to the challenges of digital healthcare. Particular attention is paid to the conceptual ambiguity of the very concept of "responsible digital healthcare" (RDH), which is actively developed as an ethical and legal framework in Western literature but remains peripheral and terminologically vague in Russian scientific discourse. Russian bioethics, while maintaining continuity with pre-revolutionary medical ethics and Soviet deontology, proposes an alternative model based on a balance between individual autonomy and the collective good. The article substantiates the need to achieve conceptual clarity in understanding AI ethics as a first and essential step toward developing an adaptive normative platform. A distributed responsibility model is proposed as a solution, defining the responsibilities of the AI system developer, physician, and healthcare organization based on their roles in hybrid human-AI systems. Creating a safe and equitable healthcare system requires an adaptive regulatory framework capable of aligning AI development with bioethical and legal standards. The success of such regulation depends not only on interdisciplinary dialogue between technologists, physicians, lawyers, and legislators, but also on public participation, which ensures trust and the ethical legitimacy of these technologies.
bioethics, types of responsibility, artificial intelligence in medicine, digital healthcare, moral agency, legal regulation
1. Vershinina V.A., Pron'kin N.N. Social'nye riski ispol'zovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta v medicine // International Journal of Professional Science. - №5. 2025. - URL: http://scipro.ru/article/44-05-2025 (data obrascheniya: 02.03.2026).
2. Ignat'ev A.G. Etiko-filosofskie problemy proektirovaniya iskusstvennogo moral'nogo agenta // Eticheskaya mysl'. T. 24, - №1. 2024. - S. 87-100. - URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/etiko-filosofskie-problemy-proektirovaniya-iskusstvennogo-moralnogo-agenta (data obrascheniya: 02.03.2026).
3. Kobrinskiy B.A. Doverie k tehnologiyam iskusstvennogo intellekta // Iskusstvennyy intellekt i prinyatie resheniy. - №3. 2024. - S. 3-17.
4. Kodeks etiki primeneniya iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere ohrany zdorov'ya v Rossiyskoy Federacii / Yu.I. Koroleva, A.L. Hohlov, O.R. Artemova, E.V. Kostina, T.V. Zarubina // Vrach i informacionnye tehnologii - № 2. 2025. - S. 98-106.
5. Kodeks etiki v sfere II v medicine i zdravoohranenii // Al'yans v sfere iskusstvennogo intellekta. - URL: https://ethics.a-ai.ru/ethics-of-medicine/ (data obrascheniya: 02.03.2026).
6. Mehanizmy vnedreniya tehnologiy iskusstvennogo intellekta v zdravoohranenie: novye eticheskie vyzovy / A.L. Hohlov, T.V. Zarubina, M.Yu. Kotlovskiy, A.V. Pavlov, M.P. Potapov, O.N. Soldatova, L.F. Gabidullina, E.B. Cybikova // Medicinskaya etika. - № 3. 2024. - S. 4-10.
7. Naryshkin A.A., Naryshkina A.A. Cifrovizaciya zdravoohraneniya v stranah BRIKS+ // Sovremennaya Evropa. - №1 (129). 2025. - S. 136–149.
8. O personal'nyh dannyh: federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2006 № 152-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. - № 31 (1 ch.). 2006. - St. 3451.
9. Selivanova E.S., Konopiy A.S. Yuridicheski znachimye priznaki iskusstvennogo intellekta i ih vliyanie na pravovoy status resheniy, prinimaemyh intellektual'nymi sistemami // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. T. 21. - № 3. 2025. - S. 49-61.
10. Sokolov V.M., Stovba A.V. Etika otvetstvennosti: proishozhdenie i tendencii konceptual'noy evolyucii // V mire nauchnyh otkrytiy. - № 7.1(55). 2014. - S. 636-653.
11. Sokolov V.M. Specifika formirovaniya bioeticheskoy otvetstvennosti lichnosti v usloviyah medicinskoy professional'noy shkoly // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. - № 4. 2014. - URL: http://www.science-education.ru/118-13919 (data obrascheniya: 02.03.2026).
12. Sokolov V.M. Bioeticheskaya determinaciya moral'nyh cennostey sovremennoy mediciny // Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. - № 9 (5). 2014. - S. 1151-1155. - URL: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=35034 (data obrascheniya: 02.03.2026).
13. Chernovickaya Yu.V. Cifrovye tehnologii v medicine: specifika otvetstvennosti pri ih ispol'zovanii // Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Social'nye i gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Tom 6, - № 4. 2020. - URL: https://rrhumanities.ru/journal/article/2257/ (data obrascheniya: 02.03.2026).
14. Sheykin A.G. Rossiya nuzhdaetsya v kompleksnom zakone ob iskusstvennom intellekte // Parlamentskaya gazeta. 25 fevralya 2025.
15. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: transforming the practice of medicine / Junaid Bajwa, Usman Munir, Aditya Nori, Bryan Williams. Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul - URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8285156/pdf/futurehealth-8-2-e188.pdf
16. The impact of digital health technologies on moral responsibility / E.Meier, T.Rigter, M.Schijven M.Hoven, M.Bak / Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy (2025) 28:17-31. - URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-024-10238-3.
17. Transformaciya usloviy i ekonomicheskih otnosheniy v sisteme obespecheniya naseleniya prodovol'stviem : monografiya / M.M. Kislickiy. – M.: VNIIESH, 2018. 260 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TVKOEB.
18. Sovershenstvovanie institucional'noy infrastruktury APK: voprosy teorii i praktiki : monografiya / A.N. Semin, M.M. Kislickiy, A.S. Lylov, V.Yu. Vorona. – M.: KOL LOK, 2023. 360 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CYVLVS.
